Verizon released a new “Acceptable
use policy” to take effect March 4, 2008. One of the main purposes of
the new policy is to squash all freedom of speech by their users and to
make public their policy of spying on their customers for government and
industry behalf. Recent internet postings from American citizens have
pressured government to reject senate bills granting Verizon and other
large telecommunications companies immunity from any possible civil and
criminal liability for laws broken with illegal wiretapping. Verizon
has admitted to
breaking these laws, but has, with the Bush administration, kept most
of their activities secret from congressional and public oversight. The
public fought against immunity for telecommunications
companies, some of
the type of political speech that Verizon is attempting to silence with
this new document.
The new policy,
released Feb 29, is multiple pages long and deals with vague
restrictive policies that provides the ISP censorship control over all
internet content by its providers, in strict violation of constitutional
law. For civil libertarians and those who feel that the ruling class
in America has become far too restrictive of all civil liberties, this
latest policy will be most disturbing. Verizon is part of the upper %
of America that has tremendous control over public laws and policies.
This new policy is unilaterally being pushed on their users, with no
recourse. Part of this overreaching new policy is a clause claiming
Verizon has the ability to view, store, and share all internet activity
and to share all this information with the government and all other
entities. This shared information includes personal information.
Most of the new policy appears to be a reaction to the only viable
outlet for American citizens to be involved with public policy and
exercise their Constitutional rights, such as freedom of press and
speech. The internet is the main channel that American citizens can use
to achieve their Constitutional duty as overseer of those governing
bodies, such as Verizon. The public is starting to assert those rights
and duties, actively asking for no immunity to telecommunications
companies that broke the law, no removal of our web pages (Baer and
Wikileaks), and no government secrecy and torture. Those public debates
have threatened the governing bodies’ belief that they alone should
make decisions without oversight or debate. This document is one of
Verizon’s attempts to destroy those rights, for their continued obscene
(and yes, improper) profits.
The new policy by Verizon is quite long, so the sections here will
take up some space, even in summary form (quoting directly from the
source document).
The policy claims the right (by which I think they mean ‘power’) to
remove internet service from any user “if your use of the Service or
your use of an alias or the aliases of additional users on your
account, whether explicitly or implicitly, and in the sole discretion
of Verizon: (a) is obscene, indecent, pornographic, sadistic, cruel or
racist in nature, or of a sexually explicit or graphic nature; (b)
espouses, promotes or incites bigotry, hatred or racism; (c) might be
legally actionable for any reason, (d) is objectionable for any reason,
or (e) in any manner violates the terms of this Acceptable Use Policy.
“
Verizon feels they alone can determine the nature of all internet
use, not you nor any 3rd party like a court or public opinion.
Verizon’s own actions are indecent and might be legally actionable, but
they have to power to restrict our speech and grant themselves immunity.
The terms are very vague, including the meaning of ‘indecent’ and
‘objectionable’. Freedom of speech, by definition and court decisions,
protect all of these types of speech. The courts have decided that
hate and racist speech, like that of the KKK, is protected. This policy
restricts much more than people like the KKK, it restricts all speech –
with this vague language. Verizon wants to silence everybody.
Luckily the United States Constitution protects all citizens from
this behavior. Unfortunately, Verizon appears to have the power to
override the constitution – at least at this point.
The policy continues, “You may NOT use the Service as follows: (a)
for any unlawful, improper or illegal purpose or activity”. To which
code of etiquette ‘improper’ refers is unclear. Do they allow you to
write about keeping the soup spoon on the left side? I always write
with my pinky finger raised, thankfully.
It continues, “…to post or transmit information or communications
that, whether explicitly stated, implied, or suggested through use of
symbols, are obscene, indecent, pornographic, sadistic, cruel, or
racist in content, or of a sexually explicit or graphic nature; or
which espouses, promotes or incites bigotry, hatred or racism; or which
might be legally actionable for any reason”
Throughout this document, terms like ‘implied’ are used, which could
mean every speech. This document is so vague and restrictive, that it
is almost impossible to find an internet post that does not fall under
these restrictions. If someone posts that they are Christian and follow
the bible, it can imply that they follow every aspect of that text,
including the parts that deal with harming non believers. According to
this document, that would be restricted. It is just intolerable in a
society, even partially free, to allow such a restrictive powerful
entity like Verizon to unilaterally force such a system, as seen in this
document.
At this point, I would like to explain what I would find acceptable,
in this document. Verizon, I feel, has the right to distance themselves
from any legal or liable responsibility for any illegal or liable
action resulting from someone using their system to connect to the
internet. If a user breaks the law or is sued for liable behavior
committed by an individual or company using Verizon internet connection,
I do not believe Verizon should be liable (unless they took an active
part) and their user agreement should spell this out. In fact, prior
versions of this policy contain exactly that, (from memory I do not have
a copy available to review).
Moving on, because so much of this very long document is intolerable
to society. The document restricts posts that are: “flaming’ and
“off-topic”, “deceptive” (like when Verizon was fined for deceptive activity?),
“to use any name or mark of Verizon, its parent, affiliates or
subsidiaries” (to use their name online? How do we as citizens or
journalists refer to them, as the ‘BIG V’?), “or to cause the screen to
“scroll” faster than other subscribers or users are able to type to it”.
Here is an interesting attempt by Verizon to circumvent court
rulings. Courts have ruled that people can retain anonymity and free
speech over the internet .
That isn’t surprising, considering the basis of American law.
However; Verizon here wishes to circumvent those ruling by removing all
who, “…use a false name while using the Service or implying an
association with Verizon.” Taken as worded, this apparently applies to
people who post without their real name (like SkeptiSys) and imply they
have used Verizon’s services in the past (association). That the name
is false or hidden and the association can all be true and legal, is
only an obstacle for Verizon.
Another item : “to make false or unverified complaints against any
Verizon subscriber.” This clause is ridiculous. Many statements will
be unverified or unverifiable. “I bet that there is a Verizon customer
who drives an SUV while eating Cheetos”, is a statement both false and
unverified.
A different twist in this one: “…to generate excessive amounts (as
determined by Verizon in its sole discretion) of Internet traffic”.
Verizon has already been fined for falsely deceiving their customers
over internet connection, but this is truly fraudulent. People signed
up for a rate of data transfer, and then they are later told that the
rate is limited. How limited? We are not saying yet, just that we plan
to cap the amount and charge you lots more for the same or less
service. What a scummy way to do business.
I need to cut this article short (I believe it is Verizon’s intent to make the document unreviewable based on time and effort) .
There is a section on copyright infringement, which looks like it was
written by a representative of the RIAA. This last section that
follows the RIAA section I will include here, because I feel needs to be
known by the public. “Verizon reserves the right to cooperate with
legal authorities and/or injured third parties in the investigation of
any suspected crime or civil wrong. Such cooperation may include, but
not be limited to, provision of account or user information or email as
well as monitoring of the Verizon network.” and “Verizon may, but is
not required to monitor your compliance, or the compliance of other
subscribers, with the terms, conditions or policies of this Agreement.”
This last part says they can at their discretion look at everything
you do online, and will not keep that information private. They can, at
their discretion, share that info with any person company or government
they see fit, at a minimum on a suspicion. Of course, there is no
recourse or criteria for such a suspicion. This clause actually states
that they feel they have the right to spy on all users activity for the
government and anyone else. Amazing.
Source : http://skeptisys.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/verizon-attacks-civil-liberties-and-makes-illegal-spying-part-of-their-policy/
